Beiträge von SL1000

Only the data partition is encrypted. Unlock is done by entering a password. so if the nas fails, buy another one that is at least as big, move the drives over in the same order, boot the nas and presto everything should be as it was again (so enter the password to unlock the drive)

Known issue in firmware 3.5.1, upgrade to 3.5.2 to fix it

or use this package: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/829890…ware/Optware_0.99.163.zip
changes:
- export path bug fixed
- ntp only is configured when not configured at all
- added ipkg web package, so Optware ipkgs can be managed through the webinterface (login only permitted to admin, with the admin password, does NOT work on the old 109 and 209 arm systems)
- uses the QDK package builder, so it cleans up after a failed install (Thanks Micke)
- checks for existance of the tsx19 kernel dir on startup and adds/removes it accordingly (so if eventually the kernel packages resurface, a restart of optware should be enough to add them to the feed again)
- can be installed over an existing (or failed) installation, so no need for manual removal of the optware dir.

so you could return the wd's?

well, after the debacle with tler, and lcc counters with their previous eads and ears series i've grown totally allergic to them. QNAP, and all other Linux based NAS systems had so many issues with these previous lines, that i don't trust their present line either until confirmed compatible by at least 3 nas vendors...

but you might be a nice guinea pig proving me wrong

WD does not support those drives in raid-5, nor does QNAP have those on the HD-support list -> http://www.qnap.com/de/pro_compatibility.asp
I would strongly advice you to pick another type, to prevent disappointments in the near future...

A qpkg for subsonic is available, and can be found here: http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=45581

straight out of them, sorry. as i don't have mac i don't know the specific issues with them. i know 3.5.0 fixes a few issues with timemachine, and stuff, but it is not my general field of expertise, sorry

1. seems like you are currently downloading something via the buildin download station, as it takes up 40% of the available cpu capacity. should it be doing that?
2. i see some memory shortage, probably causing the system to swap. that will also slow things down. questions is what is responsible for the memory usage...

Could you run top again, but after it started press "M" (Capital!) that will sort the processes by memory usage.
post that again and i can analyze further what is using memory on the system.

a 212 has a very limited amount of memory (to little imho), so it is always smart to disable every service you don't need. nfs, appletalk, itunes erver, twonky media streaming, etc.

once it gets slow again, login via ssh (enable it before it gets slow)
and run the following commands:

free


top

post the output of both here, and we should be able to solve it for you

Any QPKGs installed? Sound to me like it is low on memory. Either that or you've hit the imfamous issue that the system gets sluggish when the filesystem is allmost full and there are many, many small files on it.

Double check though for hanging processes, consuming lots of cpu time. E.g. rpc.rquotad is one that sometimes gives issues.

boot the QNAP without drives. after booting has completed, hot plug the drives. are they recognized now?
if so, upgrade the qnap to this special firmware, during the installation process, to correct the issue: http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=160&t=47468
if not, The drive is DOA, and has to be returned to the reseller.

Coore utils not installed on my system, and i still have sort? might be because i'm already running 3.5?

[/] # which sort
/usr/bin/sort
[/] # ll /usr/bin/sort
lrwxrwxrwx 1 admin administ 12 Aug 9 23:11 /usr/bin/sort -> /bin/busybox*
[/] #

???

subsonic is another option. or even squeezeboxserver, as it also works without logitech hardware.

hmm, to be sure it is not a browser issue, you might try it with google chrome. QNAP's developers use chrome so it should always work ok with chrome

if it's a 110 and you are using ie9, just a tip:
the installation wizard is not compatible with the default ie9 browser. you'll need to click on the broken page icon on the right of the url to get it to work.

Maybe the drive is just bad? have you tested the drive in another device with the test software of the drives manufacturer for bad blocks, etc?

Zitat von "ollium"

Welche FP's kann man denn empfehlen ?
btw...ich habe das TS-210 System.
Mittlerweile frage ich mich, ob ich damit nicht etwas über's Ziel hinausgeschossen bin :oops:
Eigentlich brauche ich "nur" folgendes:
- Squeezbox Server
- Time Machine Backup Medium
- Mediaserver für ein Apple TV2

Alles anzeigen

Any of the drives on the list should work: http://www.qnap.com/pro_compatibility.asp but always do a Google on the specific type you want to buy, to see if people have issues with them.
i wouldn't recommend 3TB drives yet, as they are quite new, and stability is still very uncertain.

Zitat von "ollium"

Ich meine auf der Homepage von QNAP gelesen zu haben das die WD FP's getestet wurden ...

see bottom table and note 5: http://www.qnap.com/pro_compatibility.asp

Zitat von "ollium"

Das habe ich befürchtet :oops: gibt es keine Möglichkeit die Daten noch zu retten bzw. zu rekonstruieren ?

As QNAP only overwrites the filesystemtable, the data should be recoverable with something like ontrack easy recovery or similar. Don't write anything on the drive until you've recovered the data though.

1. WD green drives are not support in a qnap nas. (i would suggest sending them back and replace them for another drives)
2. drives that are placed inside the qnap housing will be overwritten, so never place external drives in the qnap, if you want to keep the data that is on them.